Incisive Peer Review Questions for Social Justice Capstone Projects

Gary’s 12th graders were building powerful capstone projects: choosing a current social justice issue, sharing a human story of suffering, and supporting it with 10 key facts (data, laws, statistics). Gary, Philosophy of Sports Teacher, needed sharp, insightful peer-review questions that pushed students to evaluate relevance, credibility, impact, and gaps - raising the quality of final presentations without hours of question crafting.

His prompt was detailed:

“I'm having my 12th graders work on a capstone social justice project. They have selected (1) a current social justice issue, (2) a story about a person or group of people who are suffering from the issue, (3) along with 10 of the most important facts (data, laws, statistics) that help the reader understand the suffering of the story. I would like students to peer review the story and facts of each other to see if the facts are indeed relevant to the story. What might be the incisive and insightful questions I could use for students to review each others' facts and give helpful critique? Perhaps 10 questions would be sufficient.”

In seconds, Alayna delivered these 10 exceptional questions (100 % verbatim - no changes made):

Exact Alayna Output

10 Peer Review Questions

Hi Gary! This sounds like a powerful capstone project. Moving students from a personal narrative to the systemic "why" through data is a sophisticated skill, and peer review is the perfect way to sharpen that connection.

For 12th graders, the goal is to move beyond "Is this a good fact?" to "Does this fact act as a bridge between this person's pain and the structural issue?"

Here are 10 incisive and insightful questions your students can use to critique each others' work:

Peer Review: Connecting Narrative to Data

1. The "Causal Link" Question Does this specific fact explain a direct cause of the suffering mentioned in the story? For example, if the person in the story lost their home, does the fact provide a specific statistic about local eviction laws or rent-to-income ratios?

2. The Scale Check Does the fact help the reader understand the magnitude of the story? Does it prove that the individual's experience is a widespread systemic trend rather than an isolated incident of "bad luck"?

3. The Specificity Test Is the fact too broad for this specific story? (e.g., using a national poverty statistic for a story specifically about rural healthcare access). How could the fact be narrowed to better "fit" the person's lived experience?

4. The "Missing Link" Analysis Is there a part of the person's suffering in the story that feels "unexplained" by the 10 facts provided? What piece of data or what specific law is missing that would help us understand why that person couldn't find a solution?

5. The Law vs. Life Dynamic If a law is cited, is the connection clear? Does the fact explain exactly how that specific legislation (or lack thereof) created the "dead end" the person in the story hit?

6. The "So What?" Challenge Read a fact, then read a paragraph of the story. If you removed that fact, would the reader’s understanding of the person’s struggle actually diminish? If the answer is "no," the fact might be "filler" and needs to be replaced with something more impactful.

7. Language and Tone Congruence Does the "voice" of the data match the "gravity" of the story? For instance, if the story is about a deeply emotional human rights violation, does the fact use clinical language that accidentally minimizes the suffering, or does it reinforce the urgency?

8. The "Why Now?" Factor Does the data or law cited explain why this issue is a current crisis? Does the fact provide a timeline that matches the story’s setting?

9. Counter-Narrative Defense Does the fact help "defend" the person in the story against common misconceptions or stereotypes? For example, if the story is about homelessness, does a fact about the "cost of living vs. minimum wage" help the reader see the person’s struggle as a systemic failure rather than a personal one?

10. The Structural Portrait Looking at all 10 facts together, do they paint a picture of a "system" at work, or do they feel like 10 random pieces of trivia? Do they build on each other to show how the suffering is reinforced from different angles (legal, economic, social)?

Implementation Tip for Your Classroom:

You might want to have students use a "Highlight and Match" strategy. Ask the reviewer to highlight a sentence in the story and then draw an arrow to the specific fact that explains the systemic reason behind that sentence. If they can't find a match, that’s a great place for them to offer a critique!

If you'd like to turn these questions into a formal worksheet or a digital feedback form, let me know—I can draft the layout for you!

How These Questions Became Gary’s Go-To for High-Impact Capstone Peer Review

Drives Deeper Critical Analysis: These 10 questions push 12th graders far beyond surface-level "good job" comments. By focusing on the "Causal Link" and "Structural Portrait," students are forced to rigorously evaluate whether their data truly explains the systemic "why" behind an individual's suffering, mirroring the analytical depth of college-level research.
The "Bridge" Methodology: The prompts are specifically designed to help students connect personal pain to structural issues. Question #1 (Causal Link) and Question #9 (Counter-Narrative Defense) act as a framework to prove that a story is a symptom of a widespread trend—such as rent-to-income ratios—rather than an isolated incident of "bad luck."
Ready-to-Use Instructional Scaffolding: Gary receives a "Zero-Prep" protocol that can be projected or printed instantly. The inclusion of the "Highlight and Match" strategy provides a kinesthetic way for students to visualize information gaps, ensuring that every piece of data serves a persuasive purpose in their capstone.
Fosters Empathy & Nuanced Dialogue: By including questions on "Language and Tone Congruence," the activity ensures that students handle sensitive human rights stories with the necessary gravity. This encourages a respectful, human-centered critique that balances clinical data with the urgency of lived experience.
Identifies Gaps & Redundancy: The "So What?" Challenge and the "Missing Link" Analysis train students to be ruthless editors. They learn to identify "filler" trivia and replace it with data that explains exactly how specific legislation created the "dead ends" mentioned in their narratives.
Reusable for the Entire Research Cycle: This framework is a permanent teaching asset. Gary can save this master list and instantly ask Alayna to "add a solutions-oriented focus" or "emphasize policy impact" for future units on climate justice, immigration, or racial equity.Ready to raise your capstone peer reviews to profound, impactful levels that prepare students for higher education and real-world advocacy?

Copy Gary’s prompt into Alayna’s AI Teaching Assistant (Chat) and create your own customized questions instantly.

👉 Try Alayna for free

Tags: #PeerReview #Capstone #SocialJustice #CriticalThinking #HighSchool #Philosophy #Rubric #AIteachingAssistant #Chat